Selling Epoxies - Why We Talk Volume and Not Weight
Why do I prefer talking about coverages in volume and not weight as many others do?
This is only a short post, but I feel it helps clear up and very common point of confusion in the industry.
The Golden Rule of coverages
The basic laws of physics give us a very simple rule that we can use to derive coverages. I call it the Golden Rule and it goes like this: 1
litre will cover 1 square metre at 1mm thick.
Using this rule, you can derive the coverage of a product based on a film thickness. For instance, you can work out that 1 litre applied 500 microns will cover 2 square metres, or, with a little more effort, you can turn the equation around to work out a 300-micron film applied over 45 square metres will require 13.5 litres.
Is it really cheaper?
With the simplicity and power of this rule, why do some start talking about weight when it comes to the cost of epoxy flooring?
There might be a few answers to that, but the most obvious reason I can see is marketing. As most products have a density higher than 1, it sounds cheaper to sell based on product weight. For example, let’s say a product costs $30/litre and has a density of 1.5kg/L - if sold per kilogram it would “only” cost you $20/kg. It sounds like a bargain on the surface, but when working with actual coverages then it’s all the same at the end of the day.
There is always a “but”
A couple of points I should add on this:
The coverage rule only applies in its simplest form if there’s no evaporative solvent in the resin (see previous post on water-borne vs solvent-borne vs solventless
You can still use it, but things become a bit more complicated when solvents are involved because the dry film thickness isn’t the same as
the wet film thickness.
The coverage rule relates to theoretical coverage only. During application, you’ll experience losses from a number of factors such as
wastage in the roller/brushes and residual product left in mix containers.
For the contractors working with imperial measurements - square feet, gallons, mils etc. - I’m afraid there’s no simple coverage rule
equivalent to the metric one. You’ll have to stick with the coverages that your manufacturer gives you and just keep in mind whether they
are theoretical or practical.
How you can take action...
Ask a question - If you have any questions you'd like to ask us about this topic, hit the support button below: